|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]闫龙飞 姚万勤.事后抢劫罪未遂形态研究——以日本刑法借鉴为视点[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2011,05:76-81.
 YAN Longfei,YAO Wanqin.A Study on the Uncommitted State of Robbery Crime after the Fact -From the Perspective of Japanese Criminal Law[J].,2011,05:76-81.
点击复制

事后抢劫罪未遂形态研究——以日本刑法借鉴为视点()

《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1008-5645/CN:61-1350/C]

期数:
2011年05期
页码:
76-81
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2011-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Uncommitted State of Robbery Crime after the Fact -From the Perspective of Japanese Criminal Law
作者:
闫龙飞  姚万勤
海南大学 法学院,海南 海口 570228
Author(s):
YAN Longfei YAO Wanqin
关键词:
事后抢劫罪 未遂 刑法
Keywords:
School of Law Science Hainan University Haikou Hainan 570228 China
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
关于事后抢劫罪是否存在未遂形态及依据怎样的标准进行区分,在我国刑法中没有明确的规定,但是根据刑法的规定事后抢劫罪的目的以及罪刑相适应的要求,在我国应当承认事后抢劫存在既未遂形态;在既未遂的区分标准上,应当借鉴日本的理论并根据我国的实际情况,在解释论中予以完善,以行为人盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为未遂并且也没有造成他人轻伤以上后果的,作为认定本罪的未遂形态的具体标准。
Abstract:
In our national criminal law, there is no clear regulation about whether the uncommitted state exists in the robbery crime after the fact and what standards should be depended on in distinguishing. But according to the purpose of robbery crime after the fact and the corresponding requirement of crime punishment regulated in our national criminal law, it is necessary to admit the uncommitted state existing in post robbery in our country. And in the distinguishing standards about the uncommitted, we should learn from Japanese theory and take our national practical situation into account, and perfect the standards in the explanation theory. Meanwhile, the actor’s uncommitted behaviors in stealing, swindling and robbery, which does not cause the consequence of other persons getting wound over the slight injury, can be used as the concrete standard to judge the uncommitted state of the main crime.

参考文献/References

[1]龙洋.论转化型抢劫罪的既遂与未遂形态[J].河北法学,2009(6).
[2][日]内田文昭.刑法各论[M].3版.东京:青林书院,1996.
[3]张明楷.外国刑法纲要[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
[4][日]大谷实.新版刑法讲义各论[M].东京:成文堂,2000.
[5][日]植松正.刑法概论Ⅱ各论[M].2版.东京:劲草书房,1975.
[6][日]西田典之.刑法各论[M].2版.东京:弘文堂,2002.
[7][日]曾根威彦.刑法的重要问题:各论[M].东京:成文堂,1995.
[8]王世斌.转化型抢劫罪不应存在未遂形态[J].人民检察,2007(16).
[9]王伟标,李鹏展.论转化型抢劫罪的犯罪形态[J].浙江公安高等专科学校学报,2004(5).〖ZK)〗
[10]沈莺,王刚.论转化型抢劫罪的犯罪形态[J].铁路警官高等专科学校学报,2003(1).
[11]甘雨沛,杨春洗.犯罪与刑罚新论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1991.
[12]秦永峰.准抢劫罪若干疑难问题研究[J].河南社会科学,2008(3).
[13]王作富.刑法分则实务研究:中[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2010.
[14]林琳.转化型抢劫罪犯罪形态研究[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2009(3).
[15]李希慧,童伟华.行为犯的构造 [J].法律科学,2002(4).
[16]马克昌.犯罪通论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[17]刘明祥.财产罪比较研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[18]李希慧.抢劫罪的对象、标准及转化问题研究[J].人民检察,2007(18).
[19]张明楷.刑法学[M].3版.北京:法律出版社,2007.
[20]赵秉志.中国刑法案例与学理研究:第四卷[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[21]马克昌.比较刑法学原理:外国刑法学总论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[22][日]山中敬一.刑法各论Ⅰ [M].东京:成文堂,2004.
[23][日]福田平.全订刑法总论[M].东京:有斐阁,2004.
[24][日]大塚仁.刑法各论[M].2版.东京:有斐阁,1996.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-01-11