|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姚绍芬.我国两审终审制度的考量——以国外审级制度比较为视角[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2011,01:63-67.
 YAO Shaofen.Considerations on China Two-Tier Appellate System—Taking the Foreign Trial Grade System as the Visual Angle of Comparison[J].,2011,01:63-67.
点击复制

我国两审终审制度的考量——以国外审级制度比较为视角()

《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1008-5645/CN:61-1350/C]

期数:
2011年01期
页码:
63-67
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2011-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Considerations on China Two-Tier Appellate System
—Taking the Foreign Trial Grade System as the Visual Angle of Comparison
作者:
姚绍芬
福建师范大学 法学院,福建 福州 350007
Author(s):
YAO Shaofen
The Law School, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350007, China
关键词:
审级制度 两审终审 三审终审
Keywords:
trial grade system two-tier appellate system three-tier appellate system
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
审级制度是审判制度的重要组成部分,同时也是诉讼中的一项重要制度。近年来,不少学者对两审终审制度提出质疑,认为我国现行的两审终审制度已不适应现实审判的要求,存在种种弊端,应予以改革,主张改现行的两审终审制为三审终审制。然而通过对国外审级制度的比较及成因的分析可知,一国的审级制度应该与本国的国情相适应。同时对学者所提出的两审终审制的弊端,实质是整个司法体制的问题,而非审级制度的问题,而且实行三审终审制也不具有可行性。我国的两审终审制的存续有其合理性,应加以坚持而不应废除。
Abstract:
The trial grade system is one significant part of trial system, and is also an important lawsuit system. In recent years, a number of scholars questioned the two-tier appellate system, considering that the current two-tier appellate system in our country cannot meet the needs of real trial and have some drawbacks. So they insist that the current trial grade system should be transformed into three-tier appellate system. However, by the contrast with foreign trial grade systems and the analysis of their forming causes, it is known that one country’s trial grade system should be compatible with its national condition. Meanwhile, it is also presented that drawbacks mentioned by scholars are actually the issues of the whole judicial system, but not the problems of the trial grade system. Besides, it is not feasible to conduct three-tier appellate system in China. In short, the existence of our two-tier appellate system has its own rationality, so it is necessary to maintain it instead of abandoning it.

参考文献/References

[1]程荣斌,邓云.审级制度研究[J].湖南省政法管理干部学院学报,2001(5).
[2]朱立恒.刑事审级制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
[3]李园梅.论我国民事诉讼的两审终审制[J].法制与社会,2008(3).
[4]陈业宏,唐铭.中外司法制度比较[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[5]樊崇义.诉讼法学研究:第7卷[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2004.
[6]宋世杰.刑事审判监督研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
[7]尹丽华.刑事上诉制度研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2006.
[8]刑克波,房锦东.论对我国两审终审制度的坚持和完善[J].当代法学,2002(8).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-09-28
作者简介:姚绍芬,女,福建漳州人,福建师范大学法学院在读硕士研究生,研究方向:民商法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-02-01